Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri reviews the denial of Janice Barbara Toler’s application for Social Security disability insurance benefits. The Court holds that substantial evidence supports the Administrative Law Judge’s residual functional capacity determination, including the decision not to require periodic leg elevation for lymphedema and lower-extremity swelling. The Court affirms the Commissioner’s decision and orders that a separate judgment accompany the Memorandum and Order.
Holdings
- The ALJ adequately considered and discounted Plaintiff's reported need for periodic leg elevation because the ALJ identified good reasons supported by substantial evidence, including effective treatment, improvement in the edema, limited subsequent treatment, and Plaintiff's daily activities.
- Substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that Plaintiff did not have an ongoing disabling limitation requiring periodic leg elevation and retained the residual functional capacity to perform light work and her past relevant work as a consultant.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff's subjective testimony concerning the need to periodically elevate her legs.
- Whether substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that Plaintiff's lower-extremity swelling and lymphedema did not impose an ongoing work-preclusive limitation.
- Whether the ALJ adequately considered the medical evidence, treatment history, and Plaintiff's daily activities in determining her residual functional capacity and disability status.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- Johnson v. Astrue, 628 F.3d 991, 992 (8th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Biestek v. Berryhill, 587 U.S. 97, 103 (2019)(followed)
- Chaney v. Colvin, 812 F.3d 672, 676 (8th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Papesh v. Colvin, 786 F.3d 1126, 1131 (8th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Halverson v. Astrue, 600 F.3d 922, 929 (8th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Hensley v. Colvin, 829 F.3d 926, 932 (8th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Hensley v. Colvin, 829 F.3d 926, 933-34 (8th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Pearsall v. Massanari, 274 F.3d 1211, 1218 (8th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Moore v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 520, 524 (8th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Singh v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 448, 452-53 (8th Cir. 2000)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.