Summary
The court addresses service of process after plaintiff paid the full filing fee in a civil action. The order describes three service options, requires service within the applicable deadline, and warns that failure to timely serve defendants may result in dismissal without prejudice.
Holdings
- Because plaintiff paid the full filing fee, plaintiff—not the court or the United States Marshals Service—was responsible for effecting service on defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
- The court has discretion to grant or deny a request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) for service by a United States marshal, deputy marshal, or specially appointed person, and plaintiff must show good cause for such relief.
- Plaintiff was required to effect service no later than 90 days after the complaint was filed or 30 days after the order, whichever was later; absent good cause, failure to timely serve would result in dismissal of the claims against the unserved defendants without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Who was responsible for serving defendants after plaintiff paid the full filing fee?
- What methods could plaintiff use to effect service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4?
- What showing was required for court-authorized service by a United States marshal or other specially appointed person?
- What deadline governed service, and what consequence would follow from an untimely failure to serve?
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Yates v. Baldwin, 633 F.3d 669, 672 (8th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Christians v. Hanvey, 4:23-CV-04137-LLP, 2024 WL 5293192, at *2 (D. S.D. Dec. 11, 2024)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…