Summary
The court grants plaintiff Breanna Backfisch’s unopposed motion to compel Trucking Times, Inc. to designate and produce a corporate representative for a deposition under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6). The order directs Trucking Times to produce the representative by April 15, 2026, in connection with plaintiff’s personal injury action arising from a commercial motor vehicle crash.
Holdings
- Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) and 37(a), the court may compel an organization that has failed to designate or produce a corporate representative to designate, prepare, and produce a witness for deposition.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should compel Trucking Times, Inc. to designate and produce a corporate representative for a deposition under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6).
- Whether an organizational entity may be compelled to produce a Rule 30(b)(6) witness to testify about information known or reasonably available to the organization, including when the entity may no longer be operational.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Sprint Communications Co., L.P. v. Theglobe.com, Inc., 236 F.R.D. 524, 527 (D. Kan. 2006)(followed)
- Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc., 193 F.R.D. 633, 639 (D. Minn. 2000)(followed)
- W.R. Grace & Co. v. N&M, Inc., No. 1:06mc602WJG, 2006 WL 3694595, at *2 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 13, 2006)(followed)
- Kanaji v. Philadelphia Child Guidance Ctr. of Children's Hosp., No. CIV.A. 00-937, 2001 WL 708898, at *2 (E.D. Pa. June 20, 2001)(followed)
- Cedar Hill Hardware & Constr. Supply, Inc. v. Ins. Corp. of Hannover, 563 F.3d 329, 345 (8th Cir. 2009)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…