Robert Wilson v. Unique Logistics International, Inc. et al.

Summary

The Eastern District of New York dismissed Robert Wilson’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action concerning the alleged delay by the New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in deciding his appeal. The court held that the request for injunctive relief was moot, judicial immunity barred the claim against Justice Hector D. LaSalle, and the complaint failed to allege state action by Unique Logistics International, Inc.; dismissal was with prejudice.

Holdings

1. The request for injunctive relief was moot because the New York Appellate Division had already issued the decision that Wilson sought the federal court to compel.
2. Judicial immunity barred Wilson's claim for declaratory relief against the presiding Justice because the alleged failure to promptly decide or manage the appeal was conduct within the Justice's judicial function.
3. The complaint failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Unique Logistics because it alleged no state action or conduct under color of state law.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Wilson's request for injunctive relief became moot after the state appellate court issued the delayed decision.
2. Whether judicial immunity barred Wilson's declaratory-relief claim against the presiding Justice of the New York Appellate Division, Second Department.
3. Whether Wilson stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Unique Logistics International, Inc. absent an allegation that the company acted under color of state law.

Disposition

dismissed