Summary
The Eastern District of New York addresses sanctions for a nonparty's civil contempt arising from failure to comply with a subpoena for employment and payroll records. The court grants Chase's application, provides SET a final opportunity to comply, imposes a $500-per-day coercive sanction upon continued noncompliance, and awards reasonable attorneys' fees and costs subject to further submission. The court declines to address possible preclusion of lost-wage evidence as premature and beyond the scope of the application.
Holdings
- A coercive monetary sanction of $500 per day was appropriate to secure SET's compliance with the subpoena and the court's orders, beginning after a final opportunity to purge the contempt and continuing until full compliance.
- Chase was entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with prosecuting SET's contempt because SET's disobedience was willful.
- The court declined to preclude Plaintiff from introducing lost-wages evidence because that request was premature and was not properly before the court in the sanctions application against SET.
Questions Presented
- What coercive sanction was appropriate for SET's continued civil contempt and failure to comply with the subpoena and court orders?
- Whether Chase was entitled to compensatory reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in prosecuting the contempt motions.
- Whether the court should preclude Plaintiff from introducing lost-wages evidence because of SET's noncompliance.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (24)
- Leser v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 2011 WL 1004708 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2011)(followed)
- In re Martin-Trigona, 732 F.2d 170, 173 (2d Cir. 1984)(followed)
- Kosowski v. Nassau County, 350 F.R.D. 346, 354 (E.D.N.Y. 2025)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. New Generation Hardware Store Corp., 2024 WL 1406953 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2024)(followed)
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Golden Rule Appliance Co., 252 F.2d 467, 469 (2d Cir. 1958)(followed)
- Paramedics Electromedicina Comercial, Ltda. v. GE Med. Sys. Info. Techs., Inc., 369 F.3d 645, 657-58 (2d Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 371 (1966)(followed)
- Freund v. Weinstein, 2009 WL 4065585 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 23, 2009)(followed)
- Ametek, Inc. v. North Shore Int'l Inc., 2017 WL 3172821 (E.D.N.Y. July 26, 2017)(followed)
- Mauro v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 2009 WL 3463570 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2009)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…