Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC v. Samuel Kennedy, Kennedy Technology MK, and Kennedy Technology, LLC

No. 24-CV-00013 (JMW) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2026) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York · February 11, 2026 · No. 24-CV-00013 (JMW)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted Defendants’ motion concerning the manner of producing the PrepMod software source code in discovery. The court ordered Plaintiff to produce the source code through GitHub using read-only access and permitted monitoring through the platform’s history tools. Production was ordered by March 4, 2026, and the parties were directed to file a joint status report by March 28, 2026.

Holdings

  1. Because GitHub was the original platform used to develop the PrepMod source code and provided a practical and reasonably usable means of preserving and reviewing the code and its history, the source code must be produced through GitHub rather than through Plaintiff's proposed alternative review arrangements.
  2. GitHub production must use the platform's read-only feature, and Plaintiff may monitor Defendants' activity through GitHub's history tools to ensure that no modifications occur.
  3. Plaintiff was required to produce the source code by March 4, 2026, and the parties were required to file a joint status report by March 28, 2026; existing discovery dates and deadlines remained in abeyance pending that report.

Questions Presented

  1. What method and platform should be used to produce and permit review of the PrepMod source code during discovery?
  2. Whether Plaintiff's proposed air-gapped, monitored virtual, or biometric-review alternatives were warranted instead of production through GitHub.
  3. Whether GitHub production should be subject to restrictions, including read-only access and monitoring, under the parties' protective order and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (16)

  • Multi-State P'ship for Prevention, LLC v. Kennedy, No. 24-CV-00013 (JMW), 2024 WL 5146067, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2024)(followed)
  • Uni-Sys., LLC v. United States Tennis Ass'n, Inc., No. 17-CV-147 (KAM)(CLP), 2018 WL 6179433, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 27, 2018)(applied)
  • Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., No. 11-CV-01846 (LHK), 2012 WL 10817203, at *7-8 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)(applied)
  • Computer Assocs. Int'l, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693, 702 (2d Cir. 1992)(applied)
  • Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429, 439 (2d Cir. 2001)(applied)
  • Junger v. Daley, 209 F.3d 481, 483 (6th Cir. 2000)(applied)
  • Equistar Chemicals L.P. v. Indeck Power Equip. Co., No. 18-CV-4349 (ASH), 2020 WL 4746469, at *2-3 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2020)(applied)
  • McEnroe v. Mantissa Corp., No. 14-CV-12320 (LTS), 2016 WL 7799636, at *9 n.6 (D. Mass. Feb. 29, 2016)(applied)
  • ILOG, Inc. v. Bell Logic, LLC, 181 F. Supp. 2d 3, 7 n.2 (D. Mass. 2002)(applied)
  • Xinuos, Inc. v. IBM Corp., No. 22-CV-09777 (CS) (VR), 2024 WL 5010717, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2024)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…