Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York grants Strike 3 Holdings, LLC leave to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on Verizon Fios to identify the subscriber associated with IP address 68.132.15.21 before service of process and a Rule 26(f) conference. The order imposes protective conditions, including notice to the subscriber, a 60-day period to challenge the subpoena or seek anonymous litigation, attorneys’-eyes-only disclosure, and restrictions on settlement contact and use of the information.
Holdings
- Good cause existed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d)(1) to permit Plaintiff to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on the Internet service provider to obtain the name and address of the subscriber associated with the specified IP address.
- Leave to serve the Rule 45 subpoena was granted subject to conditions requiring ISP notice to the subscriber, a 60-day opportunity to challenge or seek anonymous treatment, attorneys'-eyes-only disclosure, limits on the information sought and its use, preservation of responsive information, and restrictions on pre-service contact and settlement discussions.
Questions Presented
- Whether good cause existed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d)(1) to permit expedited discovery before service of process and the Rule 26(f) conference.
- What protective conditions were necessary before Plaintiff could subpoena the Internet service provider for the Doe defendant's name and address.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (12)
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, No. 20 Civ. 4501 (WFK) (VMS) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2021)(followed and incorporated)
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, No. 19 Civ. 945 (NGG) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2019)(relied on)
- In re Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, No. 17 Civ. 5630 (JS) (SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2018)(relied on)
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, No. 18 Civ. 440 (PKC) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2018)(relied on)
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 964 F.3d 1203, 1214 (D.C. Cir. 2020)(relied on)
- UN4 Prods., Inc. v. Doe et al., No. 17 Civ. 3278 (PKC) (SMG) (E.D.N.Y. June 14, 2017)(relied on)
- Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, No. 15 Civ. 3504 (JFB) (SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2016)(relied on)
- In re BitTorrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement Cases, 296 F.R.D. 80, 84-85, 90, 93 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)(relied on)
- Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Doe 1, 288 F.R.D. 233 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)(relied on)
- Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176, 279 F.R.D. 239, 242 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)(relied on)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…