The New York State Nurses Association v. The Brooklyn Hospital Center

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York · February 14, 2026 · No. 26-CV-745(EK)(PCG)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied the New York State Nurses Association’s renewed motion for a temporary restraining order seeking immediate payment of allegedly overdue benefit-fund contributions by The Brooklyn Hospital Center. The court concluded that the plaintiff had not shown a sufficient likelihood that a reverse Boys Markets injunction was necessary to preserve the integrity of pending arbitration. The court ordered the plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and directed further briefing on jurisdiction and the requested relief.

Holdings

  1. A federal court must assure itself that it has, or likely has, subject matter jurisdiction before granting preliminary injunctive relief; where the plaintiff has not made that showing, preliminary relief must be denied.
  2. A reverse Boys Markets injunction may issue only when necessary to prevent arbitration from being rendered a meaningless ritual, meaning that the threatened irreparable injury must threaten the integrity of the arbitration process itself; NYSNA did not make that showing on the existing record.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could grant a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction without a sufficient showing that it likely possessed subject matter jurisdiction.
  2. Whether NYSNA established the requirements for a reverse Boys Markets injunction, including that injunctive relief was necessary to prevent the pending arbitration from becoming a meaningless ritual.
  3. Whether the case should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Truck Drivers Loc. Union No. 807 v. Bohack Corp., 541 F.2d 312, 318 (2d Cir. 1976)(followed)
  • New York v. Nat'l Sci. Found., 793 F. Supp. 3d 562, 577 (S.D.N.Y. 2025)(followed)
  • Niagara Hooker Emps. Union v. Occidental Chem. Corp., 935 F.2d 1370, 1375, 1377-78 (2d Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770, 398 U.S. 235 (1970)(followed)
  • Aeronautical Indus. Dist. Lodge 91 of Int'l Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. United Techs. Corp., 230 F.3d 569, 581 (2d Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Loc. 217 Hotel & Rest. Emps. Union v. MHM, Inc., 805 F. Supp. 93, 108-10 (D. Conn. 1991), aff'd, 976 F.2d 805 (2d Cir. 1992)(noted)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…