Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina grants Coastal Federal Credit Union's amended motion to remand a foreclosure action to Wake County Superior Court. The court concludes that the defendants' removal was untimely and that their extensive participation in the state-court proceedings waived any right to remove. The court rejects reliance on references to the Americans with Disabilities Act as a basis for federal-question jurisdiction and remands the action in its entirety.
Holdings
- The removal was untimely because the defendants identified no amended pleading, motion, order, or other paper received from which removability first became ascertainable within the applicable thirty-day period.
- The defendants waived their right to remove by engaging in substantial defensive action in state court for approximately six months before filing the notice of removal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the defendants timely removed the foreclosure action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1446(a) and 1446(b)(3).
- Whether references to the Americans with Disabilities Act or ADA accommodations in a state-court order created a basis for federal removal jurisdiction.
- Whether the defendants waived the right to remove by substantially litigating and pursuing defensive actions in state court before removal.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- Korzinski v. Jackson, 326 F. Supp. 2d 704, 708 (E.D.N.C. 2004)(followed)
- Northrop Grumman Tech. Servs., Inc. v. DynCorp Int'l LLC, 865 F.3d 181, 186 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Northrop Grumman Tech. Servs., Inc. v. DynCorp Int'l LLC, 865 F.3d 181, 187 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Lovern v. Gen. Motors Corp., 121 F.3d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…