Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina grants the plaintiff leave to amend his complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). The court denies the defendant's motion to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings without prejudice and directs the clerk to file the proposed amended complaint.
Holdings
- Leave to amend should be granted because the record showed no bad faith, no prejudice to defendant, and no apparent futility or plain insufficiency in the proposed amendment.
- The motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings were denied without prejudice after leave to amend was granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a).
- Whether defendant's motion to dismiss and motion for judgment on the pleadings should be decided before the amended complaint was filed.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Nathan v. Takeda Pharms. N. Am., Inc., 707 F.3d 451, 461 (4th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co., 785 F.2d 503, 509-510 (4th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Booker v. City of Lynchburg, No. 6:20-CV-11, 2020 WL 8513807, at *2 (W.D. Va. Nov. 12, 2020)(followed)
- Laber v. Harvey, 438 F.3d 404, 426 (4th Cir. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…