Sarah James v. Verizon Wireless

United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina · March 26, 2026 · No. 5:25-CV-811

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina adopts a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation after finding no clear error and no party having objected. The court dismisses Sarah James’s complaint against Verizon Wireless for failure to state a claim, grants her motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and grants leave to file a superseding amended complaint.

Holdings

  1. When neither party timely objects to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting de novo review.
  2. The complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim.
  3. The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis was granted.
  4. The plaintiff was granted leave to file a superseding amended complaint.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court should review the unobjected-to memorandum and recommendation for clear error.
  2. Whether the complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
  3. Whether plaintiff should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
  4. Whether plaintiff should be granted leave to file a superseding amended complaint.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 622 (4th Cir. 2007)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…