Westlake Flooring Company, LLC, d/b/a Westlake Flooring Services v. Mormar LLC, d/b/a Better Value Motors, and Amie Morgan Baudoin

Westlake Flooring · United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina · February 19, 2026 · No. 7:24-CV-741-M

Summary

A United States magistrate judge recommends granting Westlake Flooring Company’s motion for default judgment against Mormar LLC and Amie Morgan Baudoin. The recommendation addresses breach of a promissory note and loan and security agreement, breach of a personal guaranty, attorney’s fees and costs, post-judgment interest, and foreclosure and possession of secured collateral. The recommended award is $106,949.09, plus post-judgment interest and related foreclosure relief.

Holdings

  1. Default judgment is appropriate where default has been entered, the well-pleaded allegations support the requested relief, and the court has subject-matter and personal jurisdiction over the action and defendants.
  2. The complaint sufficiently established breach of the financing agreement by Mormar and breach of the personal guaranty by Baudoin under California law.
  3. A secured creditor is entitled to judicial possession and foreclosure relief where it establishes a valid, enforceable, perfected security interest, the defendants took or held the property subject to that interest, and the defendants defaulted.
  4. A default judgment may award a liquidated or mathematically calculable amount without an evidentiary hearing, and Westlake established entitlement to $106,949.09, consisting of the $77,420.32 loan balance and $29,528.77 in attorney's fees and costs.
  5. Westlake is entitled to post-judgment interest calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether default judgment should be entered after default was entered and defendants failed to respond.
  2. Whether the well-pleaded allegations established liability for breach of the financing agreement and personal guaranty under California law.
  3. Whether Westlake established entitlement to possession and foreclosure of the collateral securing the debt.
  4. Whether Westlake established the amount of damages, attorney's fees, costs, and post-judgment interest without an evidentiary hearing.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (13)

  • Ryan v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F.3d 778, 780 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • EE.O.C. v. Carter Behavior Health Servs., Inc., No. 4:09-CV-122-F, 2011 WL 5325485, at *3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2011), adopted by, 2011 WL 5325473 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2011)(followed)
  • Alliance Funding Grp. v. Torchlight Academy Schools, No. 5:23-CV-00074-M, 2024 WL 6995879 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2024)(followed)
  • Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Bldg. Sys., Inc., 733 F.2d 1087, 1089 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)
  • W. Sur. Co. v. Beck Elec. Co., No. CIV. 3:06-CV-383, 2008 WL 345821 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2008)(followed)
  • United Artists Corp. v. Freeman, 605 F.2d 854, 857 (5th Cir. 1979)(followed)
  • Mosteller Mansion, LLC v. Mactec Eng’g & Consulting of Georgia, Inc., 190 N.C. App. 674, 661 S.E.2d 788 (2008)(followed)
  • D’Arrigo Bros. of California v. United Farmworkers of Am., 224 Cal. App. 4th 790, 800 (2014)(followed)
  • United States v. Wise, No. 5:14-CV-844-FL, 2015 WL 5918027 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2015), aff’d, 639 F. App’x 193 (4th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Paccar Fin. Corp. v. Harnett Transfer, Inc., 51 N.C. App. 1, 7-8, 275 S.E.2d 243 (1981)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…