Summary
A United States magistrate judge recommends granting Westlake Flooring Company’s motion for default judgment against Mormar LLC and Amie Morgan Baudoin. The recommendation addresses breach of a promissory note and loan and security agreement, breach of a personal guaranty, attorney’s fees and costs, post-judgment interest, and foreclosure and possession of secured collateral. The recommended award is $106,949.09, plus post-judgment interest and related foreclosure relief.
Holdings
- Default judgment is appropriate where default has been entered, the well-pleaded allegations support the requested relief, and the court has subject-matter and personal jurisdiction over the action and defendants.
- The complaint sufficiently established breach of the financing agreement by Mormar and breach of the personal guaranty by Baudoin under California law.
- A secured creditor is entitled to judicial possession and foreclosure relief where it establishes a valid, enforceable, perfected security interest, the defendants took or held the property subject to that interest, and the defendants defaulted.
- A default judgment may award a liquidated or mathematically calculable amount without an evidentiary hearing, and Westlake established entitlement to $106,949.09, consisting of the $77,420.32 loan balance and $29,528.77 in attorney's fees and costs.
- Westlake is entitled to post-judgment interest calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
Questions Presented
- Whether default judgment should be entered after default was entered and defendants failed to respond.
- Whether the well-pleaded allegations established liability for breach of the financing agreement and personal guaranty under California law.
- Whether Westlake established entitlement to possession and foreclosure of the collateral securing the debt.
- Whether Westlake established the amount of damages, attorney's fees, costs, and post-judgment interest without an evidentiary hearing.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (13)
- Ryan v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F.3d 778, 780 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- EE.O.C. v. Carter Behavior Health Servs., Inc., No. 4:09-CV-122-F, 2011 WL 5325485, at *3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2011), adopted by, 2011 WL 5325473 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2011)(followed)
- Alliance Funding Grp. v. Torchlight Academy Schools, No. 5:23-CV-00074-M, 2024 WL 6995879 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2024)(followed)
- Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Bldg. Sys., Inc., 733 F.2d 1087, 1089 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)
- W. Sur. Co. v. Beck Elec. Co., No. CIV. 3:06-CV-383, 2008 WL 345821 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2008)(followed)
- United Artists Corp. v. Freeman, 605 F.2d 854, 857 (5th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Mosteller Mansion, LLC v. Mactec Eng’g & Consulting of Georgia, Inc., 190 N.C. App. 674, 661 S.E.2d 788 (2008)(followed)
- D’Arrigo Bros. of California v. United Farmworkers of Am., 224 Cal. App. 4th 790, 800 (2014)(followed)
- United States v. Wise, No. 5:14-CV-844-FL, 2015 WL 5918027 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2015), aff’d, 639 F. App’x 193 (4th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Paccar Fin. Corp. v. Harnett Transfer, Inc., 51 N.C. App. 1, 7-8, 275 S.E.2d 243 (1981)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…