Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina adopts a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation in a Social Security case. Because neither party objected and the court found no clear error, it remands the matter to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings.
Holdings
- When neither party timely objects to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting de novo review.
- The district court found no clear error in the memorandum and recommendation, adopted its conclusions, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should review the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation for clear error when neither party objected.
- Whether the memorandum and recommendation recommending remand should be adopted.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 622 (4th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…