Summary
The court dismisses Robert Seth Labreau’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to return a completed service packet and comply with a court order. The court also certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denies leave to appeal in forma pauperis if an appeal is filed.
Holdings
- A district court may dismiss an action under Rule 41(b) when a plaintiff willfully fails to comply with a court order, particularly after receiving an express warning that noncompliance will result in dismissal, and the Rule 41(b) factors support dismissal.
- Any appeal from the dismissal would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous; therefore, Plaintiff would be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to prosecute and failed to comply with the court's service-packet order.
- Whether an appeal would be taken in good faith and whether Plaintiff should be permitted to appeal in forma pauperis.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Schafer v. City of Defiance Police Department, 529 F.3d 731, 736 (6th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Knoll v. AT&T Co., 176 F.3d 359, 363 (6th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. Hirshberg Acceptance Corp., 62 F.4th 270, 277 (6th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Wu v. T.W. Wang, Inc., 420 F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 109 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…