Southern Environmental Law Center v. Tennessee Valley Authority; Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC

No. 3:24-CV-00110-JRG-DCP (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 12, 2026) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee · January 12, 2026 · No. No. 3:24-CV-00110-JRG-DCP

Summary

In this Freedom of Information Act action, the Southern Environmental Law Center challenged the adequacy of the Tennessee Valley Authority’s search and its withholding of records concerning a proposed gas pipeline project. The court held that TVA’s search was adequate and that its use of FOIA Exemption 6 was not opposed, but found the agency’s categorical justification for Exemption 4 insufficient. The court therefore granted and denied the parties’ summary-judgment motions in part and ordered Defendants to provide a Vaughn Index.

Holdings

  1. TVA conducted an adequate FOIA search because its declarations established a good-faith effort using methods reasonably expected to produce responsive records.
  2. Using the date of the initial search, March 13, 2024, as the cutoff date for the supplemental search was reasonable.
  3. TVA was not entitled to summary judgment on its use of FOIA Exemption 4 because its categorical approach did not sufficiently identify each withheld document or clearly define the categories, particularly the category for preliminary project information.
  4. Defendants were entitled to summary judgment on TVA's use of Exemption 6 because SELC did not oppose the withholding of personal cell phone numbers and email addresses and thereby conceded the issue.
  5. Any claim based solely on TVA's failure to make a timely FOIA determination became moot when TVA issued its response.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether TVA's search for records responsive to SELC's FOIA request was adequate.
  2. Whether TVA's use of March 13, 2024, as the cutoff date for its supplemental search was reasonable.
  3. Whether TVA adequately justified its withholding and redaction of records under FOIA Exemption 4 without a Vaughn Index or comparable document-by-document accounting.
  4. Whether TVA's redaction of personal cell phone numbers and email addresses under FOIA Exemption 6 was proper when SELC did not oppose that relief.
  5. Whether SELC's claim based on TVA's failure to make a timely FOIA determination remained justiciable after TVA issued a response.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (25)

  • Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. (CREW) v. United States DOJ, 602 F. Supp. 2d 121, 123 (D.D.C. 2009)(followed)
  • NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 242 (1978)(followed)
  • Vaughn v. United States, 936 F.2d 862, 865, 867-68 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • ACLU of Mich. v. FBI, 734 F.3d 460, 465 (6th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Competitive Enter. Inst. v. EPA, 232 F. Supp. 3d 172, 181 (D.D.C. 2017)(followed)
  • Roseberry-Andrews v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 299 F. Supp. 3d 9, 20 (D.D.C. 2018)(followed)
  • Weisberg v. Dep't of Justice, 745 F.2d 1476, 1485 (D.C. Cir. 1984)(followed)
  • CareToLive v. FDA, 631 F.3d 336, 338, 340 (6th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • McGehee v. CIA, 697 F.2d 1095, 1105 (D.C. Cir. 1983)(followed)
  • McClanahan v. United States DOJ, 204 F. Supp. 3d 30, 47 (D.D.C. 2016)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 25.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…