Task Force BPO, LLC v. Ava Consulting, LLC and Remko Bloemhard

Task Force BPO · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee · April 22, 2026 · No. 3:24-CV-53-TAV-JEM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee directs the Clerk to enter default against corporate defendant AVA Consulting, LLC. The court concludes that AVA failed to defend the action by failing to obtain replacement counsel after multiple opportunities and by failing to respond to the plaintiff’s application for default.

Holdings

  1. A corporate defendant that fails to obtain licensed counsel after repeated court orders and warnings, and fails to respond to an application for default, has failed to otherwise defend the action and is subject to entry of default under Rule 55(a).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a corporate defendant that failed to obtain licensed replacement counsel after repeated court orders and warnings, and failed to otherwise defend the action, was subject to entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • In re Classicstar Mare Lease Litigation, No. 5:07-cv-353, 2009 WL 1468594, at *1 (E.D. Ky. May 13, 2009)(followed)
  • GCIU-Emp. Ret. Fund v. Amerigraph, LLC, No. 2:06-CV-1072, 2008 WL 762082, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2008)(followed)
  • Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Acord, No. 2:18-CV-01014, 2019 WL 1277168, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 20, 2019)(followed)
  • Brittney Gobble Photography, LLC v. Wenn Ltd., No. 3:16-CV-306, 2019 WL 2446997, at *5 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 19, 2019)(followed)
  • Brittney Gobble Photography, LLC v. USA Ent. News, Inc., No. 3:16-CV-306, 2019 WL 1125644 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 12, 2019)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…