Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas grants Altra Federal Credit Union's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Random Chat, LLC's patent-infringement complaint. The court holds that representative claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,099 is directed to the abstract idea of establishing random online chat sessions and lacks an inventive concept under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and the case is closed.
Holdings
- The court could resolve patent eligibility at the pleading stage without conducting claim construction because no claim-construction issue precluded a dispositive analysis and ineligibility was apparent from the patent and representative claim.
- Claim 1 is directed to the abstract idea of initiating or facilitating a random conversation through online chat technology and therefore is directed to a patent-ineligible concept.
- Claim 1 does not contain an inventive concept sufficient to transform the abstract idea into a patent-eligible application under § 101.
- Dismissal with prejudice was warranted because amendment would be futile; no amendment to the complaint could alter what the patent itself states.
Questions Presented
- Whether claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,099 is directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under the first step of the Alice framework.
- Whether claim 1 contains an inventive concept sufficient to transform the claimed abstract idea into a patent-eligible application under the second step of the Alice framework.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed with prejudice or whether leave to amend should be granted.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (19)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593, 602, 610-11 (2010)(followed)
- Ultramerical, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, 722 F.3d 709, 718-19 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (Mayer, J., concurring)(followed)
- Bancorp Servs., L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assur. Co., 687 F.3d 1266, 1273 (Fed. Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Berkheimer v. HP Inc., 881 F.3d 1360, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576, 589 (2013)(followed)
- Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208, 217-18, 221, 225-26 (2014)(followed)
- SAP Am., Inc. v. InvestPic, LLC, 898 F.3d 1161, 1167 (Fed. Cir. 2018)(followed)
- RecogniCorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., 855 F.3d 1322, 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2017)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…