Random Chat, LLC v. Altra Federal Credit Union

Random Chat · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division · March 6, 2026 · No. 2:25-CV-00478-JRG

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas grants Altra Federal Credit Union's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Random Chat, LLC's patent-infringement complaint. The court holds that representative claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,099 is directed to the abstract idea of establishing random online chat sessions and lacks an inventive concept under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and the case is closed.

Holdings

  1. The court could resolve patent eligibility at the pleading stage without conducting claim construction because no claim-construction issue precluded a dispositive analysis and ineligibility was apparent from the patent and representative claim.
  2. Claim 1 is directed to the abstract idea of initiating or facilitating a random conversation through online chat technology and therefore is directed to a patent-ineligible concept.
  3. Claim 1 does not contain an inventive concept sufficient to transform the abstract idea into a patent-eligible application under § 101.
  4. Dismissal with prejudice was warranted because amendment would be futile; no amendment to the complaint could alter what the patent itself states.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,099 is directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under the first step of the Alice framework.
  2. Whether claim 1 contains an inventive concept sufficient to transform the claimed abstract idea into a patent-eligible application under the second step of the Alice framework.
  3. Whether the complaint should be dismissed with prejudice or whether leave to amend should be granted.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (19)

  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593, 602, 610-11 (2010)(followed)
  • Ultramerical, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, 722 F.3d 709, 718-19 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (Mayer, J., concurring)(followed)
  • Bancorp Servs., L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assur. Co., 687 F.3d 1266, 1273 (Fed. Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Berkheimer v. HP Inc., 881 F.3d 1360, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576, 589 (2013)(followed)
  • Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208, 217-18, 221, 225-26 (2014)(followed)
  • SAP Am., Inc. v. InvestPic, LLC, 898 F.3d 1161, 1167 (Fed. Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • RecogniCorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., 855 F.3d 1322, 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2017)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…