Robert Demison III v. Bryan Collier, et al.

Demison · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division · February 25, 2026 · No. 6:25-cv-174-JDK-KNM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas overruled Robert Demison III's objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The court adopted the report and dismissed the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim, while preserving without-prejudice claims potentially asserted against officials named in a second emergency-relief motion and claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).

Holdings

  1. A party's objections must specifically identify the findings or conclusions challenged; frivolous, conclusory, or general objections need not be considered as a basis for rejecting the report and recommendation.
  2. A claim or legal theory raised for the first time in objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is not properly before the district court, particularly where the pleadings do not contain factual allegations supporting the theory.
  3. A document expressing an intent to appeal before the court has announced or entered judgment is premature and cannot be treated as a notice of appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(2).
  4. The action was properly dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), while claims against officials named in the second motion for emergency relief and claims based on § 1985(3) were dismissed without prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff's conclusory and general objections required the district court to reject or reconsider the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.
  2. Whether a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3), raised for the first time in the objections and unsupported by allegations of race-based animus or conspiracy, was properly before the district court.
  3. Whether the plaintiff's pre-judgment statement expressing an intent to appeal constituted a valid notice of appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(2).
  4. Whether the action should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc)(followed)
  • Battle v. U.S. Parole Commission, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Mosley v. Quarterman, 306 F. App'x 40, 42 n. 2 (5th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Edmond v. Collins, 8 F.3d 290, n.7 (5th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Gray v. Winco Foods, L.L.C., 683 F. Supp. 3d 571, n.3 (E.D. Tex. 2023)(followed)
  • Omran v. Prator, 674 F. App'x 353, 355 (5th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Finley v. Johnson(followed)
  • FirsTier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance Co., 498 U.S. 269, 276 (1991)(followed)
  • United States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 963 (5th Cir. 1998)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…