Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas overruled Darryl Glenn Davis’s objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation concerning his habeas petition challenging an aggravated-assault conviction. The court accepted the report, denied the petition with prejudice, denied a certificate of appealability, and denied pending motions as moot.
Holdings
- Objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation must specifically identify the findings being challenged; frivolous, conclusive, or general objections need not be considered.
- A party's entitlement to de novo review does not permit the party to raise arguments not presented to the magistrate judge without a compelling reason.
- Petitioner failed to establish any error warranting habeas relief, and the petition was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether petitioner's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation warranted de novo review or relief.
- Whether arguments and facts raised for the first time in objections to the magistrate judge's report should be considered absent a compelling reason.
- Whether the habeas petition should be denied and the action dismissed with prejudice.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Vettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 n.8 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (en banc)(overruled on other grounds)
- Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc)(overruling authority)
- Cupit v. Whitley, 28 F.3d 532, 535 & n.5 (5th Cir. 1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…