Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia resolves the remaining privilege-designation issue in Plaintiff Agalar Aliev’s motion to compel discovery from Trans Union, LLC in a Fair Credit Reporting Act action. The court holds that most of Trans Union’s redactions, including those covering a credit-file summary, reason codes, and remaining documents, are not protected work product, while sustaining limited designations for potentially attorney-client communications. Trans Union is ordered to produce unredacted versions of specified pages by January 30, 2026.
Holdings
- Trans Union's redactions to the summary report were not protected opinion work product because they did not reveal counsel's selection of particular documents from a larger universe; instead, the report showed that counsel requested production of the plaintiff's entire credit file.
- The court sustained the privilege designations for specified redactions on pages TU 00003 and TU 00005 because the materials may relate to attorney-client communications, but overruled the designation for page TU 00004 because Trans Union provided no rationale for redacting the summary report or audit trail.
- Reason codes explaining why Trans Union printed documents from Aliev's credit file were not protected work product.
- Trans Union failed to establish privilege or work-product protection for the remaining documents and was required to produce unredacted versions.
Questions Presented
- Whether Trans Union's redactions to the summary report constituted protected opinion work product because they identified documents counsel directed personnel to collect or print.
- Whether the redacted comments were protected by the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine.
- Whether reason codes explaining why documents were printed constituted protected work product.
- Whether Trans Union established privilege or work-product protection for the remaining entirely redacted documents.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- In re Allen, 106 F.3d 582 (4th Cir. 1997)(applied)
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp., 805 F.2d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 (1985)(followed)
- James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 93 F.R.D. 138, 144 (D. Del. 1982)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.