Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation concerning Plaintiff Yvette L.’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Court awarded $6,963.21 in fees, subject to reduction for qualifying federal debts and without prejudice to counsel’s potential Social Security Act fee request under 42 U.S.C. § 406.
Holdings
- When no timely objection is filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court need only determine that no clear error appears on the face of the record before accepting the recommendation.
- Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA attorney-fee award of $6,963.21, rather than the $7,300.82 requested.
- Payment of the EAJA award is contingent on the Government's determination that Plaintiff has no qualifying pre-existing debt to the Government; any such debt may be offset, and the award remains subject to the statutory relationship between EAJA fees and fees later awarded under 42 U.S.C. § 406.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should accept the magistrate judge's report and recommendation when neither party filed timely objections.
- Whether Plaintiff should receive an EAJA attorney-fee award of $6,963.21 rather than the $7,300.82 requested.
- Whether payment of the EAJA award is subject to offset for qualifying pre-existing federal debt and to the statutory treatment of any later award under 42 U.S.C. § 406.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Berry v. Hunt, 13 F. App'x 148, 149 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…