Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted David Ambrosio Rivera’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his continued immigration detention without a bond hearing. The court held that Rivera was subject to discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A), and ordered that he receive a bond hearing within one day.
Holdings
- Rivera was not seeking admission for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) and instead fell within the category of noncitizens already in the country subject to discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Because 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) governed Rivera's detention, he was entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge.
- Rivera's continued detention without a bond hearing was unlawful and violated his due process rights.
Questions Presented
- Whether a noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection is subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) or discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether Rivera was entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether continued detention without a bond hearing violated Rivera's due process rights.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (4)
- Duarte Escobar v. Perry, 807 F. Supp. 3d 564 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed)
- Hasan v. Crawford, 800 F. Supp. 3d 641, 651-57 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed)
- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 32 (1982)(applied)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 693 (2001)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…