Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Xirgo Technologies, LLC; Xirgo Holdings, Inc.; OBD Sensor Solutions LLC v. Xirgo Technologies, LLC; Xirgo Holdings, Inc.

Fleet Connect · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division · June 1, 2026 · No. Nos. 2:25-cv-712 and 2:25-cv-713

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied defendants’ motions to transfer two patent infringement actions to the Northern District of Illinois and to stay the cases pending resolution of the transfer motions. The court found that the plaintiffs’ choice of forum favored transfer, while witness and party convenience were neutral. The interest of justice strongly favored retaining the related cases in Virginia to promote judicial economy and avoid inconsistent judgments.

Holdings

  1. The actions could have been brought in the Northern District of Illinois because Xirgo's principal place of business was in Rolling Meadows, Illinois, within that district.
  2. Transfer to the Northern District of Illinois was not warranted because, on balance, the § 1404(a) factors favored retaining the cases in the Eastern District of Virginia.
  3. The motions to stay were denied as moot because the court resolved the transfer motions in the same Opinion and Order.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the patent-infringement actions could have been brought in the Northern District of Illinois under the applicable venue statutes.
  2. Whether the § 1404(a) convenience and interest-of-justice factors warranted transferring the actions from the Eastern District of Virginia to the Northern District of Illinois.
  3. Whether the cases should be stayed pending resolution of the transfer motions.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (18)

  • Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988)(followed)
  • Cognitronics Imaging Systems, Inc. v. Recognition Research Inc., 83 F. Supp. 2d 689, 696 (E.D. Va. 2000)(followed)
  • Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., 928 F. Supp. 2d 863, 867, 869, 870-871 (E.D. Va. 2013)(followed)
  • Storage Technology Corp. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 329 F.3d 823, 836 (Fed. Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Plumbing Services, Inc., 791 F.3d 436, 444 (4th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011)(followed)
  • Koh v. Microtek International, Inc., 250 F. Supp. 2d 627, 631, 633, 636-637 (E.D. Va. 2003)(followed)
  • Global Touch Solutions, LLC v. Toshiba Corp., 109 F. Supp. 3d 882, 896, 898, 904-905 (E.D. Va. 2015)(followed)
  • GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 517, 519 (E.D. Va. 1999)(followed)
  • Acterna, L.L.C. v. Adtech, Inc., 129 F. Supp. 2d 936, 938-940 (E.D. Va. 2001)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…