Summary
The court granted Jose Bonilla Giron’s habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, holding that his detention was governed by the discretionary detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than the mandatory detention provisions of § 1225(b)(2)(A). The court ordered Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge within three days and to file a status report afterward.
Holdings
- A noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection but is already in the country and is not seeking initial admission is subject to the discretionary detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A).
- Because § 1226(a) governs Petitioner's detention, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge.
- Petitioner's continued detention without a bond hearing violates his due process rights.
Questions Presented
- Whether a noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection and is already physically present in the country is subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) or discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether continued detention without a bond hearing violates due process.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (4)
- Duarte Escobar v. Perry, 807 F. Supp. 3d 564 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed and incorporated)
- Hasan v. Crawford, 800 F. Supp. 3d 641, 651-57 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed and incorporated)
- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 32 (1982)(applied)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 693 (2001)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…