Summary
The Eastern District of Virginia granted Jose Guzman Marquez’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that, as a noncitizen already present in the United States, Marquez was subject to discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A). The court ordered Respondents to provide him with a bond hearing within five days and to file a status report afterward.
Holdings
- A noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection but is already in the country and is not seeking initial admission falls within the discretionary detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than the mandatory-detention provision of § 1225(b)(2)(A).
- Because § 1226(a) governs, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge, and his continued detention without a bond hearing is unlawful and violates due process.
Questions Presented
- Whether a noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection is subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) or discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- Whether Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge under § 1226(a).
- Whether continued detention without a bond hearing violates due process.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (4)
- Duarte Escobar v. Perry, et al., 807 F. Supp. 3d 564 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed and incorporated)
- Hasan v. Crawford, 800 F. Supp. 3d 641, 651-57 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed and incorporated)
- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 32 (1982)(applied)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 693 (2001)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…