Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia adopted an unopposed report and recommendation concerning Robert Lee Chew's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The court granted the respondent's motion to dismiss, denied and dismissed the petition with prejudice, and denied a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- When no specific written objection is filed, the district court may adopt a magistrate judge's recommendation without de novo review unless the recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
- The respondent's motion to dismiss was granted, and Chew's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied and dismissed with prejudice.
- A certificate of appealability was denied because the basis for dismissal was not debatable and Chew had not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court could adopt the magistrate judge's report and recommendation without de novo review when neither party filed a timely objection.
- Whether the respondent's motion to dismiss should be granted and Chew's § 2254 petition denied and dismissed with prejudice.
- Whether Chew was entitled to a certificate of appealability.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)(followed)
- Carr v. Hutto, 737 F.2d 433 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)
- United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984)(followed)
- Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 316 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335–38 (2003)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483–85 (2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…