Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed without prejudice a pro se prisoner’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The court held that the complaint failed to identify the constitutional right allegedly violated and did not provide each defendant fair notice of the factual and legal basis for liability; the plaintiff then failed to file the ordered particularized complaint.
Holdings
- A viable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 requires allegations that a person acting under color of state law deprived the plaintiff of a constitutional right or a right conferred by federal law. The complaint failed to satisfy this requirement because it did not identify the constitutional right allegedly violated.
- Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because the plaintiff failed to submit the ordered particularized complaint or otherwise respond within the prescribed thirty-day period after being warned that noncompliance would result in dismissal.
- The complaint failed to provide each defendant fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which liability rested.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff's failure to submit a particularized complaint after being ordered and warned that noncompliance would result in dismissal warranted dismissal of the § 1983 action.
- Whether the original complaint adequately stated a viable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley, 145 F.3d 653, 658 (4th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(followed)
- Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…