Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed without prejudice a Virginia pretrial detainee’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that the petitioner had not exhausted available state remedies and had not shown exceptional circumstances warranting federal review.
Holdings
- A federal court should generally withhold habeas relief when a state pretrial detainee has not exhausted available state-court remedies, absent exceptional circumstances warranting immediate federal review.
- The § 2241 petition must be dismissed without prejudice because Reed failed to exhaust available state remedies and failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting federal review.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should dismiss a state pretrial detainee's § 2241 petition for failure to exhaust available state remedies.
- Whether exceptional circumstances justified federal habeas review before completion of the state criminal proceedings.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (14)
- Bowen v. Johnston, 306 U.S. 19, 27 (1939)(followed)
- Timms v. Johns, 627 F.3d 525, 530-31 & n.5 (4th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 793 (2008)(followed)
- Stack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1951)(followed)
- Olsson v. Curran, 328 F. App’x 334, 335 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 489-92 (1973)(followed)
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 49 (1971)(followed)
- Stroman Realty, Inc. v. Martinez, 505 F.3d 658, 662 (7th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Neville v. Cavanagh, 611 F.2d 673, 675 (7th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Brazell v. Boyd, No. 92-7029, 1993 WL 98778, at *1 (4th Cir. Apr. 5, 1993)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…