Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington granted American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company’s motion for partial summary judgment. The court declared that the insurer had no duty to indemnify Lacey Sullivan and Daniel Sullivan in an underlying personal-injury action arising from a golf-cart accident involving their minor child. The ruling followed the court’s earlier determination that the insurer had no duty to defend and the defendants’ failure to respond to the motion.
Holdings
- The Court construed defendants' failure to respond as consent to entry of an adverse order because the motion was unopposed and the substantive record did not reveal a genuine issue of material fact.
- American Modern had no duty to indemnify Lacey and Daniel Sullivan in the underlying action under the policy.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Court could construe defendants' failure to respond to the motion for partial summary judgment as consent to an adverse order under LCivR 7(e).
- Whether American Modern was entitled to summary judgment declaring that it owed no duty to indemnify the defendants in the underlying personal-injury action.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam)(followed)
- Atain Specialty Insurance Co. v. Todd, No. 4:18-CV-5022-RMP, 2019 WL 2030329, at *5 (E.D. Wash. Jan. 24, 2019)(followed)
- Wilcox v. Batiste, 360 F. Supp. 3d 1112, 1125 (E.D. Wash. 2018)(followed)
- Henry v. Gill Industries, Inc., 983 F.2d 943, 950 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Bowen, 121 Wash. App. 879, 884 (2004)(followed)
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc., 147 Wash. 2d 751, 760 (2002)(followed)
- Unigard Insurance Co. v. Leven, 97 Wash. App. 417, 425 (1999)(followed)
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lange, 2023 WL 4704712, at *6 (W.D. Wash. July 24, 2023)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…