Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington denied Plaintiff Caryl Danita Carby’s pro se motion to change venue. The court held that the motion failed to provide supporting factual assertions and legal authority and did not identify a transferee venue, as required by the local rules.
Holdings
- A motion to change venue may be denied when the movant fails to provide the supporting factual assertions and legal authority required by the local rules and does not identify the venue to which the action should be transferred.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff's motion to change venue should be granted when it lacks supporting factual assertions and legal authority and fails to identify a proposed transferee venue.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)(followed)
- King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…