Caryl Danita Carby v. Barrack Hussein Obama, et al.

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington dismissed Caryl Danita Carby’s complaint against Barrack Hussein Obama and other defendants with prejudice. The court held that the complaint failed to state a plausible claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and that amendment would be futile; the court also noted that Plaintiff had neither renewed her in forma pauperis application nor paid the filing fee.

Holdings

1. The complaint failed to state a claim because it lacked sufficient facts to support a cognizable legal theory against any defendant.
2. Dismissal with prejudice was appropriate because it was absolutely clear that amendment would not cure the deficiencies in the complaint.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
2. Whether dismissal with prejudice was appropriate because amendment would be futile.

Disposition

dismissed