Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington denied as moot the Confederated Tribes' motion for a preliminary injunction concerning grant funding administered under the Inflation Reduction Act. The court also denied reconsideration of its prior denial of temporary restraining orders and denied a related motion to expedite, finding no clear error and emphasizing the narrow scope of judicial review of agency decision-making.
Holdings
- The motion for a preliminary injunction was moot because the requested relief was no longer available after the grant-award letters had been sent.
- Reconsideration was unwarranted because Plaintiffs did not establish newly discovered evidence, clear error, or an intervening change in controlling law.
- The court found no clear evidence that Defendants acted beyond the discretion afforded to them in establishing grant-funding eligibility standards and determining that Plaintiffs were ineligible.
Questions Presented
- Whether the motion for a preliminary injunction was moot because the requested injunctive relief was no longer available after grant-award letters had been sent.
- Whether the court should reconsider or strike its prior order denying Plaintiffs' motions for temporary restraining orders.
- Whether the record showed clear error or agency action beyond the discretion afforded to Defendants.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Pac. Radiation Oncology, LLC v. Queen’s Med. Ctr., 810 F.3d 631, 636 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- In Def. of Animals v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 648 F.3d 1012, 1013 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Kona Enter., Inc. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- American Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Const. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…