Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington reviewed an Administrative Law Judge’s denial of supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The court held that the ALJ inadequately evaluated the claimant’s symptom testimony, including her daily activities and treatment compliance, and therefore reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. The court also directed the ALJ to reevaluate the medical opinions on remand.
Holdings
- Because Kiarra F. never established disability under the initial five-step inquiry, the ALJ was not required to perform a second five-step analysis addressing whether she would remain disabled absent marijuana use.
- The ALJ did not provide a sufficient reason for rejecting Kiarra F.'s symptom testimony based on her daily activities because the ALJ failed to address the qualifying evidence showing that her impairments affected those activities.
- The ALJ could not reject Kiarra F.'s symptom testimony based on improvement with treatment or failure to follow prescribed treatment without considering possible reasons for noncompliance.
- The ALJ's discussion of the objective medical evidence was reasonable, but the decision could not reject Kiarra F.'s symptom testimony solely because the degree of alleged symptoms was not supported by objective medical evidence.
- On remand, the ALJ must reevaluate all medical opinions and prior administrative medical findings and explain their supportability and consistency.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ was required to perform a marijuana-specific second five-step analysis before considering marijuana use in evaluating the claim.
- Whether the ALJ provided legally sufficient reasons for rejecting Kiarra F.'s testimony concerning the intensity, persistence, and limiting effects of her symptoms.
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated the supportability and consistency of the medical opinions and prior administrative medical findings under 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520c and 416.920c.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (10)
- Hill v. Astrue, 698 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1111, 1115 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Shinseki v. Sanders, 556 U.S. 396, 409-10, 129 S. Ct. 1696 (2009)(followed)
- Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094, 1098 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Beltran v. Astrue, 700 F.3d 386, 389 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Bustamante v. Massanari, 262 F.3d 949, 954-55 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Ghanim v. Colvin, 763 F.3d 1154, 1163 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 1015 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Moore v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 278 F.3d 920, 924 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Bunnell v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 341, 346-47 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…