Steven Rose v. Frank Bisignano

Rose · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin · December 15, 2025 · No. 25-cv-1959-bhl

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted Steven Rose’s motion to proceed without prepaying the filing fee in his action seeking review of a Social Security Administration decision. The court found that Rose demonstrated substantial financial difficulty and that his challenge to the denial of Supplemental Security Income benefits was not frivolous and stated a potential claim.

Holdings

  1. A litigant may proceed in forma pauperis when the court determines that the litigant is unable to pay the costs of commencing the action. Based on Rose's stated income, expenses, and liquid assets, the court found that he would have substantial financial difficulty paying the filing fee.
  2. The complaint did not require dismissal at the screening stage because Rose's arguments that the administrative law judge's decision was unsupported by substantial evidence and contrary to law were not obviously frivolous and appeared to state a potential claim.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Rose demonstrated sufficient financial hardship to proceed without prepaying the filing fee.
  2. Whether the complaint was frivolous, failed to state a claim, or was brought against an immune defendant such that dismissal was required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Luevano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 722 F.3d 1014, 1018 (7th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Williams v. Faulkner, 837 F.2d 304, 306 (7th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Jones v. Morris, 777 F.2d 1277, 1279-80 (7th Cir. 1985)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…