Cheri M. Hydock-Dicosimo v. Frank J. Bisignano

Hydock-Dicosimo · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin · March 10, 2026 · No. 23-cv-1064-pp

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted Cheri M. Hydock-Dicosimo’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand and favorable Social Security benefits decision. The court approved $21,851.25 in fees and ordered counsel to refund the previously awarded $7,500 Equal Access to Justice Act fee to the plaintiff.

Holdings

  1. The requested award of $21,851.25 did not exceed the 25% cap imposed by 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
  2. The requested § 406(b) fee was reasonable and should be approved.
  3. Counsel may receive the approved § 406(b) award, but must refund the $7,500 EAJA fee to plaintiff upon receipt of the award.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the requested § 406(b) attorney fee of $21,851.25 complied with the statutory 25% cap.
  2. Whether the requested § 406(b) fee was reasonable in light of the services performed and the results obtained.
  3. Whether counsel could receive only a net § 406(b) payment reflecting an offset for the prior EAJA award, or instead had to refund the EAJA fee to plaintiff.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • Kopulos v. Barnhart, 318 F. Supp. 2d 657, 660-661 (N.D. Ill. 2004)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 794, 796, 807-808 (2002)(followed)
  • Mentecki v. Colvin, Case No. 14-cv-1110-pp, 2019 WL 3323874, at *2 (E.D. Wis. July 24, 2019)(followed)
  • Peterson v. Colvin, Case No. 12-cv-391 at Dkt. No. 32 (E.D. Wis. Sept. 3, 2015)(followed)
  • Kolp v. Colvin, Case No. 12-cv-842, 2015 WL 4623645, at *2 (E.D. Wis. Aug. 3, 2015)(followed)
  • O'Donnell v. Saul, 983 F.3d 950, 957 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Martinez v. Berryhill, 699 F. App'x 775, 776 (10th Cir. 2017)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…