Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin grants Michael James Kubichka leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee in his action seeking review of a Social Security benefits decision. The court allows the judicial-review claim to proceed but dismisses or limits claims seeking damages and other relief beyond benefits available under the Social Security Act.
Holdings
- The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis was granted because the court concluded that he lacked the resources to pay the filing fee.
- The complaint's request for judicial review of the SSA's most recent benefits decision could proceed at the screening stage, even though exhaustion was unclear, because the complaint alleged that the SSA had rendered a decision and the agency could provide information concerning exhaustion.
- The Social Security Act does not provide a plausible claim for compensatory or punitive damages, emotional-distress damages, or other extra-statutory relief arising from the denial or reduction of Social Security benefits; the remedy is limited to benefits available under the Act.
Questions Presented
- Whether Kubichka could proceed without prepaying the filing fee.
- Whether the complaint stated a claim for judicial review of the SSA's most recent denial of benefits despite uncertainty about exhaustion of administrative remedies.
- Whether the Social Security Act permits compensatory or punitive damages and other extra-statutory relief for the denial of Social Security benefits.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)(followed)
- Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009)(followed)
- Kubichka v. Kijakazi, No. 21-CV-892-LA (E.D. Wis. May 26, 2022)(followed)
- Brooks v. Richardson, 131 F.4th 613, 614 (7th Cir. 2025)(followed)
- Slabon v. Berryhill, 751 F. App'x 928, 930 (7th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412, 414, 422, 424-26 (1988)(followed)
- Williams v. Commissioner, No. 23-3185, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5984, at *6 (10th Cir. Mar. 13, 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…