Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin grants Michael Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis but denies his request to waive filing costs and fees. The court dismisses his complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) because it fails to state specific factual allegations explaining what each defendant allegedly did and how Brown was injured. The court permits Brown to file an amended complaint by June 11, 2026, and directs collection of the filing fee through institutional trust-account payments.
Holdings
- Brown was permitted to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and the court waived the initial partial filing fee because he lacked the assets and means to pay it.
- The court denied Brown's request to waive court costs and fees because the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis to pay the full filing fee by installments when funds are available.
- The complaint failed to satisfy Rule 8(a)(2) because it did not provide a short and plain statement identifying what each defendant allegedly did, when and where the conduct occurred, or what injury resulted.
- The complaint was dismissed, but Brown was granted leave to file a complete amended complaint curing the identified pleading deficiencies by June 11, 2026.
Questions Presented
- Whether Brown qualified to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and whether the initial partial filing fee could be waived.
- Whether the complaint satisfied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and stated a plausible § 1983 claim under the prisoner-screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed with leave to amend.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (6)
- D.S. v. E. Porter Cty. Sch. Corp., 799 F.3d 793, 798 (7th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Buchanan-Moore v. Cty. of Milwaukee, 570 F.3d 824, 827 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Friend v. Valley View Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 365U, 789 F.3d 707, 711 (7th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Duda v. Bd. of Educ. of Franklin Park Pub. Sch. Dist. No. 84, 133 F.3d 1054, 1056-57 (7th Cir. 1998)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…