Zavier Isiah Greene v. The City of Tuskegee, et al.

Greene · United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Eastern Division · March 30, 2026 · No. 3:25-CV-432-RAH-SMD

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama granted defendants’ motion for partial dismissal in Zavier Isiah Greene’s civil-rights action arising from a shooting investigation, searches, arrest, and prosecution. The court dismissed fictitious defendants, the Tuskegee Police Department and City of Tuskegee, official-capacity claims, time-barred Fourth Amendment claims, the Miranda claim, and an assault-and-battery claim against one defendant. The case proceeds on specified federal and state claims against certain individual defendants.

Holdings

  1. Official-capacity claims against municipal officers should be dismissed as redundant when the municipality itself is also named as a defendant.
  2. A municipality cannot be held liable under § 1983 solely because its employees committed an alleged constitutional violation; the plaintiff must allege a municipal policy or custom that caused the violation and reflected deliberate indifference to the constitutional right.
  3. Under Alabama law, a municipality cannot be held liable for the intentional torts of its employees, including assault and battery, malicious prosecution, and civil conspiracy.
  4. A claimant seeking relief under Alabama Code § 11-47-190 must plead timely compliance with the statutory presuit notice requirements, and failure to allege that compliance supports dismissal.
  5. In Alabama, § 1983 claims are subject to a two-year limitations period, and Fourth Amendment search, seizure, detention, and false-arrest claims accrue when the plaintiff knows or should know of the injury and its cause, not when later criminal charges are dismissed.
  6. The failure to provide Miranda warnings does not itself create a private cause of action under § 1983.
  7. An assault-and-battery claim under Alabama law requires an alleged harmful or offensive touching, and Greene failed to state such a claim against Kitt because he alleged no touching or physical threat by Kitt.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether official-capacity claims against municipal officers were redundant and subject to dismissal where the City of Tuskegee was also sued directly.
  2. Whether Greene plausibly alleged municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without alleging a municipal policy or custom that caused the constitutional violation.
  3. Whether Greene's Fourth Amendment search, seizure, detention, and arrest claims were barred by Alabama's two-year statute of limitations.
  4. Whether failure to provide Miranda warnings gives rise to a private § 1983 claim.
  5. Whether Greene plausibly pleaded assault and battery against Officer Quincy Kitt where he alleged no touching or physical threat.
  6. Whether Greene's claims against the Tuskegee Police Department, fictitious defendants, and specified municipal defendants should be dismissed.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (41)

  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • McCullough v. Finley, 907 F.3d 1324, 1333 (11th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701, 709-10 (11th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Worthy v. City of Phenix City, 930 F.3d 1206, 1222 (11th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165 (1985)(followed)
  • Monell v. New York City Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978)(followed)
  • Busby v. City of Orlando, 931 F.2d 764, 776 (11th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Higdon v. Fulton County, 746 F. App'x 796, 799 (11th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Ludaway v. City of Jacksonville, 245 F. App'x 949, 951 (11th Cir. 2007)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 41.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…