Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama addresses Plaintiff Ronald H. Foster’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The court orders Defendant Khurram Khan to show cause why the motion should not be granted, permits Foster to file a reply, and sets out the governing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 summary-judgment standard. The order is dated December 10, 2025.
Holdings
- Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, summary judgment is proper when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; the movant bears the initial burden, and the nonmovant must identify specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial.
Questions Presented
- What summary-judgment standard governs Plaintiff's pending cross-motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56?
- What briefing and submission schedule should govern the pending cross-motion for summary judgment?
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Palm v. United States, 904 F. Supp. 1312, 1314 (M.D. Ala. 1995)(cited)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-324 (1986)(cited)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 248, 255 (1986)(cited)
- Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 106 (1986)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…