Summary
A magistrate judge recommends denying as moot a state prisoner’s request for a preliminary injunction seeking release from restrictive housing at Kilby Correctional Facility. The recommendation concludes that the plaintiff’s transfer to another facility eliminated the threat of future harm and mooted his request for prospective injunctive relief.
Holdings
- A prisoner's claim for injunctive relief concerning conditions at a particular correctional facility becomes moot upon transfer or release from that facility, absent class certification, because the plaintiff no longer faces the threatened future injury.
- A preliminary injunction may issue only when the movant clearly establishes all four prerequisites: substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury absent relief, no substantial harm to the opposing litigant, and consistency with the public interest.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction became moot after his transfer from the facility where the alleged conduct occurred.
- What standard governs the grant or denial of a preliminary injunction.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Palmer v. Braun, 287 F.3d 1325, 1329 (11th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Long v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr., 924 F.3d 1171, 1176 (11th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., 840 F.3d 1244, 1247 (11th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Spears v. Thigpen, 846 F.2d 1327, 1328 (11th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Wahl v. McIver, 773 F.2d 1169, 1173 (11th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Owens v. Centurion Med., 778 F. App'x 754, 759 (11th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Adler v. Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 112 F.3d 1475, 1477 (11th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Smith v. Allen, 502 F.3d 1255, 1267 (11th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- McKinnon v. Talladega Cnty., Ala., 745 F.2d 1360, 1363 (11th Cir. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…