Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama overruled William C. Coleman’s objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning Dr. Siddiq’s motion for summary judgment. The court adopted the recommendation as clarified, granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 deliberate-indifference action, and denied as moot Coleman’s motion to absolve named defendants. The court held that the record did not support a reasonable finding that Dr. Siddiq acted with deliberate indifference to Coleman’s serious medical need involving wet age-related macular degeneration.
Holdings
- Dr. Siddiq was entitled to summary judgment because Coleman failed to produce sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that Siddiq acted with deliberate indifference or subjective criminal recklessness regarding Coleman's wet macular degeneration treatment.
- The court rejected portions of the magistrate judge's alternative reasoning because arguments in a summary-judgment motion are not evidence and the record did not show that Siddiq prioritized cataract surgery over wet-macular-degeneration treatment or misunderstood the distinction between wet and dry macular degeneration.
- The defendants' motions for summary judgment were granted as to all defendants.
- The district court must make a de novo determination of portions of a magistrate judge's report or recommendation to which a specific objection is made.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's recommendation granting Dr. Siddiq summary judgment should be rejected because the record supported a finding that he was deliberately indifferent to Coleman's serious medical need.
- Whether the evidence showed that Dr. Siddiq subjectively knew of and deliberately disregarded a substantial risk to Coleman's vision by failing to ensure timely Avastin injections.
- Whether summary judgment was appropriate for the remaining defendants.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 673, 675 (1980)(followed)
- Taylor v. Adams, 221 F.3d 1254, 1258 (11th Cir. 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.