Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed Demetrious D. Johnson’s civil-rights complaint without prejudice during screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court found that the complaint failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10 and improperly joined multiple unrelated claims and defendants, and it allowed Johnson 21 days to file an amended complaint pursuing one related incident.
Holdings
- A civil-rights complaint must organize its factual allegations into separate, numbered paragraphs, with each paragraph limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances; Johnson's complaint failed to satisfy that requirement.
- A plaintiff may pursue only related claims in one civil-rights complaint; unrelated claims against different defendants may not be joined unless they arise out of the same transaction or occurrence and satisfy the applicable joinder requirements. Johnson could pursue only one of the apparently unrelated incidents in this action.
- When a complaint has pleading and joinder deficiencies that prevent meaningful screening, the court may dismiss it without prejudice and permit the plaintiff to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint complied with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10's requirement that claims and defenses be stated in numbered paragraphs limited, as practicable, to a single set of circumstances.
- Whether the complaint improperly joined unrelated claims against separate defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2).
- Whether dismissal without prejudice and an opportunity to amend were appropriate remedies for the pleading and joinder deficiencies.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Rosado v. Nichols, 2:18-CV-195-JES-MRM, 2017 WL 1476255, at *6 (M.D. Fla. 2017)(followed)
- George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…