Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted Denis Dagoberto Duarte Cantarero’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court held that his detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225(b)(2), and ordered the respondents to provide an individualized immigration bond hearing within ten days or release him under reasonable conditions of supervision.
Holdings
- The district court had jurisdiction because the petitioner's challenge to the statutory basis for his current detention fell outside the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of § 1252(g) and § 1252(b)(9).
- Exhaustion was excused because pursuing available administrative remedies would have been futile.
- The petitioner's detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), not § 1225(b)(2); mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2) was unlawful.
- A noncitizen detained under § 1226(a) is entitled to an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge.
Questions Presented
- Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) or § 1252(b)(9) deprived the district court of jurisdiction over the challenge to the petitioner's immigration detention.
- Whether exhaustion of administrative remedies should be excused as futile.
- Whether the petitioner was detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) or § 1226(a).
- Whether a noncitizen detained under § 1226(a) is entitled to an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge.
Disposition
granted
Cases Cited (4)
- Vaz v. Skinner, 634 F. App’x 778, 781 (11th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Hinojosa Garcia v. Noem, No. 2:25-cv-879-SPC-NPM, 2025 WL 3041895 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2025)(followed)
- Vasquez Carcamo v. Noem, 2:25-cv-922-SPC-NPM, 2025 WL 3119263 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 7, 2025)(followed)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 306 (2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…