Summary
The court dismissed without prejudice a pro se habeas petition challenging immigration detention because it was unsigned and did not properly identify a respondent. The court granted 21 days to file a signed and verified amended petition and required any purported next friend to establish the propriety of that status.
Holdings
- A habeas petition must be signed and verified by the person seeking relief or by a properly established next friend; a person may not litigate on the detainee's behalf merely by labeling himself an authorized representative.
- A habeas petition must identify the person who has custody over the petitioner and the authority for that custody, when known; the petition's failure to identify a respondent independently supported dismissal without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether an unsigned habeas petition may proceed when the person filing on behalf of the detainee has not established next-friend status.
- Whether a habeas petition may proceed when it does not identify the person having custody over the petitioner.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 162-64 (1990)(followed)
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 435 n.8 (2004)(relied_on)
- Masingene v. Martin, 424 F. Supp. 3d 1298, 1302 (S.D. Fla. 2020)(relied_on)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…