Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted Walver Daniel Vilorio Moncada’s amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court held that his immigration detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225(b)(2), entitling him to an individualized bond hearing. Respondents were ordered to provide a bond hearing within ten days or release him under reasonable conditions of supervision.
Holdings
- Sections 1252(g) and 1252(b)(9) do not strip the district court of jurisdiction over Moncada's challenge because the action falls outside their scope.
- Exhaustion was excused because requiring it would be futile.
- Moncada's detention was governed by § 1226(a), not § 1225(b)(2); mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2) was unlawful.
- As a noncitizen detained under § 1226(a), Moncada was entitled to an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge.
Questions Presented
- Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) or § 1252(b)(9) deprived the district court of jurisdiction over Moncada's habeas challenge to his immigration detention.
- Whether exhaustion of administrative remedies should be excused as futile.
- Whether Moncada's detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) or § 1226(a).
- Whether a noncitizen detained under § 1226(a) is entitled to an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (3)
- Hinojosa Garcia v. Noem, No. 2:25-cv-879-SPC-NPM, 2025 WL 3041895 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2025)(followed)
- Vasquez Carcamo v. Noem, 2:25-cv-922-SPC-NPM, 2025 WL 3119263 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 7, 2025)(followed)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 306 (2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…