Dravian Dravius Darvin Byrd v. Department of Corrections

Byrd v. Department of Corrections · United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division · November 21, 2025 · No. 3:25-cv-1416-JEP-PDB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed without prejudice an inmate’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Florida Department of Corrections. The court held that the FDC is not a “person” subject to monetary liability under § 1983 and directed the Clerk to close the case while allowing the plaintiff to file a new action against an appropriate defendant.

Holdings

  1. The complaint failed to state a plausible claim for relief because it sought damages from the Florida Department of Corrections, an entity that is not a person subject to monetary liability under § 1983.
  2. The court was required to dismiss the complaint because it failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted and the damages claim against the Florida Department of Corrections was frivolous.
  3. Dismissal was without prejudice, permitting Plaintiff to initiate a new action asserting plausible claims against a proper person defendant.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the complaint stated a plausible claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Florida Department of Corrections.
  2. Whether the Florida Department of Corrections is a person subject to monetary liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
  3. Whether dismissal under the Prison Litigation Reform Act should be without prejudice.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Mitchell v. Farcass, 112 F.3d 1483, 1490 (11th Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • Alba v. Montford, 517 F.3d 1249, 1252 (11th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 683 (11th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • In re Plywood Antitrust Litigation, 655 F.2d 627, 641 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept. 8, 1981)(followed)
  • Gardner v. Riska, 444 F. App’x 353, 355 (11th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989)(followed)
  • McNamara v. GEICO, 30 F.4th 1055, 1061 (11th Cir. 2022)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…