Tobias Shinn, Jr. v. Colonel Lindsey, et al.

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division · February 10, 2026 · No. 3:25-cv-247-MMH-LLL

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed Tobias Shinn, Jr.’s § 1983 action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply with court orders. The court found that Shinn failed to respond to the defendants’ motion to dismiss or to an order to show cause and directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case.

Holdings

  1. A district court may sua sponte dismiss a pro se plaintiff's action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when the plaintiff fails to comply with court rules or a court order.
  2. Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because Shinn failed to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss and the court's order to show cause, and did not request additional time.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Shinn's failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute.
  2. Whether dismissal without prejudice was warranted after Shinn failed to respond to the motion to dismiss and the order to show cause despite being warned of the potential consequences.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (7)

  • Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Tannenbaum v. United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Albra v. Advan, Inc., 490 F.3d 826, 829 (11th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Hargrove v. Capela, 792 F. App'x 758, 759 (11th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Powell v. Harris, 628 F. App'x 679, 680 (11th Cir. 2015) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Duong Thanh Ho v. Costello, 757 F. App'x 912, 914-15 (11th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • McNamara v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 30 F.4th 1055, 1060-61 (11th Cir. 2022)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…