Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida addresses a pro se plaintiff’s motions to amend her ADA and Florida Civil Rights Act complaint and to obtain CM/ECF filing access. The court permits the amended complaint to be docketed, denies CM/ECF access, and authorizes electronic notification of filings by email.
Holdings
- Because Plaintiff had not previously amended her complaint as a matter of course and no responsive pleading had been filed, she could exercise her Rule 15(a)(1) amendment right; the court therefore granted her motion to the extent necessary and directed the Clerk to docket the amended complaint.
- The court denied Plaintiff's request for permission to file documents through CM/ECF because she did not show good cause or extenuating circumstances warranting an exception to the district's general restriction on pro se electronic filing.
- Although Plaintiff was not permitted to file through CM/ECF, the court exercised its discretion to permit her to receive electronic notifications of filings by email.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff could amend her complaint as a matter of course under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), notwithstanding that she filed a motion for leave under Rule 15(a)(2).
- Whether a pro se litigant who has not shown good cause or extenuating circumstances should be permitted to file documents through CM/ECF.
- Whether the court should permit Plaintiff to receive electronic notices of filing by email.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (15)
- Shaw v. Allen, 701 F. App'x 891, 894 (11th Cir. 2017) (per curiam)(followed)
- Giles v. Manser, 757 F. App'x 891, 894 (11th Cir. 2018) (per curiam)(followed)
- Toenniges v. Ga. Dep't of Corrs., 502 F. App'x 888, 889-90 (11th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Brown v. Johnson, 387 F.3d 1344, 1349 (11th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Digital Assurance Certification, LLC v. Pendolino, No. 6:17-cv-72-ORL-41TBS, 2018 WL 11489597, at *3-4 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2018)(followed)
- Williams v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. Sys. of Ga., 477 F.3d 1282, 1292 & n.6 (11th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Spaulding v. Poitier, 548 F. App'x 587, 593-94 (11th Cir. 2013) (per curiam)(followed)
- Huminski v. Vermont, No. 2:13-cv-692-FTM-29, 2014 WL 169848, at *4 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2014)(followed)
- McMahon v. Cleveland Clinic Found. Police Dep't, 455 F. App'x 874, 878 (11th Cir. 2011) (per curiam)(followed)
- Gerow v. Blackwell, No. 8:24-cv-02280-KKM-NHA, 2024 WL 4679030, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2024)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…