Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia adopts a magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismisses Yakenski Stevens’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. The court grants the respondent’s motion to dismiss, denies the petitioner’s related motions, and denies a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- When no timely objections are filed to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting de novo review.
- The § 2254 petition was untimely because it was filed on April 30, 2024, after the April 1, 2024 filing deadline.
- A certificate of appealability was denied because petitioner did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal of the § 2254 petition as untimely should be accepted under clear-error review when no objections were filed.
- Whether the petition was untimely under the limitations period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).
- Whether petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…