Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia recommends dismissing Jerry Lee Contreras’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition without prejudice because he failed to exhaust available state remedies. The recommendation concerns challenges to his pretrial detention, bond, probable cause, counsel, and related criminal proceedings. The court also recommends denying a certificate of appealability and in forma pauperis status on appeal, while granting in forma pauperis status for purposes of the recommendation.
Holdings
- A state pretrial detainee must exhaust all available state-court remedies before seeking federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, including by presenting claims through one complete round of the state's established appellate review process.
- Failure to exhaust available state remedies is a proper basis for dismissal without prejudice of the habeas petition at screening.
- A certificate of appealability should be denied because Contreras did not make the required substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or show that reasonable jurists could debate the procedural ruling.
Questions Presented
- Whether Contreras's pretrial detention and related constitutional claims could be considered under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 before he exhausted available state remedies.
- Whether the petition should be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 4 for failure to exhaust state remedies.
- Whether a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be denied.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (12)
- O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 842 (1999)(followed)
- Paez v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., 947 F.3d 649, 653-55 (11th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Fletcher v. Oliver, No. 1:20-00347-KD-N, 2020 WL 5100631, at *2 n.4 (S.D. Ala. July 21, 2020)(followed)
- Braden v. 30th Jud. Cir. Ct. of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 489-90 & n.4 (1973)(followed)
- Hughes v. Att'y Gen. of Fla., 377 F.3d 1258, 1262 n.4 (11th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Dill v. Holt, 371 F.3d 1301, 1303 (11th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Santiago-Lugo v. Warden, 785 F.3d 467, 475 (11th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Hughes v. Coursey, No. CV 110-077, 2010 WL 3338696, at *2 (S.D. Ga. July 27, 2010)(followed)
- Mullinax v. State, 515 S.E.2d 839, 840 (Ga. 1999)(followed)
- Bozzuto v. State, 624 S.E.2d 166, 168 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…